Stanton-Walsh Rule

Recently, with the passing of Emmet Walsh, the Stanton–Walsh rule articulated by critic Roger Ebert has resurfaced. Ebert correctly noted that any film featuring Harry Dean Stanton or Emmet Walsh in a supporting role cannot be bad.

https://img.inleo.io/DQmea1VZfFM9i76pdD1CnUKXxK1F3X2feKNTRnz8met1cqG/IMG_7719.webp

source

Returning from the enjoyable Bikeriders by the even more charming Jeff Nichols, one actor stood out among a rich cast (Austin Butler, Tom Hardy, Jodie Comer, Norman Reedus): Michael Shannon as the nosy biker Zipco. Shannon, who is somewhat of a muse for Nichols, has been collaborating with him since Nichols’ first film where Shannon played the lead. Shannon often plays villains, likely due to his menacing appearance. He has portrayed a sinister sheriff (Nocturnal Animals), a malevolent alien (Man of Steel), and an evil boss (The Shape of Water). However, Shannon has tremendous range, as demonstrated in another Nichols film, Take Shelter, where he played the lead. Following the success of Take Shelter, Shannon often found himself typecast in psychologically complex roles, which later evolved into villainous characters. Now, we are witnessing a third phase in Shannon’s career as a character actor, where he often plays quirky roles.

With the loss of the legendary character actors of Ebert's golden rule, I’ve been thinking about which two actors could carry this legacy forward. For me, Michael Shannon undoubtedly deserves a spot.
The other actor that comes to mind is another Michael: Michael Stuhlbarg

Stuhlbarg has also played supporting roles in many excellent films, most recently in two Guadagnino movies, where he transitioned from a wholesome father in Call Me by Your Name to a terrifying cannibal in Bones and All. Like Shannon, Stuhlbarg has proven he can carry a film on his own, as seen in the underrated A Serious Man by the Coen brothers. It’s no coincidence that both actors had significant roles in Scorsese’s HBO series Boardwalk Empire, a breeding ground for character actors.
I believe it’s time to establish the Shannon–Stuhlbarg rule because whenever these actors appear on screen, they bring a sense of reliability and integrity. I think Stanton and Walsh would be proud of their successors. Have you ever seen a bad movie featuring either Michael?

Posted Using InLeo Alpha



0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

The first film in which I remember seeing Michael Shannon was Midnight Special. To me he was unknown at the time, but there was something about his steely unobtrusive acting that stayed with me. Ever after, I have always taken a look at any movie that features him.

Stanton–Walsh rule indeed. There are some actors who simply, it seems, won't appear in something that isn't at least interesting.

avatar

You know that when you see that name featuring in a film that film will be good !

avatar

I absolutely love this man. He brings something unique to every character, whether he's a villain or a quirky outsider. He's definitely one of those actors who elevates any movie he's in.

avatar

Congratulations @steemychicken1! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You got more than 6250 replies.
Your next target is to reach 6500 replies.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP