Casualties of War (film): Important film, but MJ Fox is not believable in his role
Ever since Back to the Future was released back in 1985, I have been a fan of Michael J. Fox. I remain steadfast in the opinion that he is a great actor.... kinda. Because of how great he was and how perfect for the role he was in BTTF this has lead me to believe that almost anything else that he is in, he just can't really be taken seriously in any role other than "Marty McFly." This isn't to suggest that I think he is a bad actor, he definitely isn't, but just because someone knocks it out of the park in one role doesn't mean they are going to be good in just anything that they are involved in. This is why I think that while this movie was and is important and is a good film, it likely would have been better had it not had Fox in the cast.
![image.png](https://images.hive.blog/768x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmY9sagb9sEDeK9oAdhRo4N2QPkkFddZFJRSQs4e51NM5A/image.png)
src
Let me be very clear about this right out of the gate: This is not your typical Vietnam War film and it is also extremely graphic in a very different way than you would expect most war or even horror films to be. This is what makes this film so important. Without giving away too much, which is probably encapsulated in the trailer which I have not yet watched, this movie is about the horrors of war and how it, specifically the Vietnam War, turns the people in it into animals who no longer see their opposition as human. The soldiers feel as though they can do whatever they want to anyone who is not on their side with impunity and see no harm and feel no moral obligation to treat them as fellow humans.
I'm not talking about soldiers wearing the uniforms of the opposing nation, I'm talking about people that simply share the same nationality, language, or culture of the enemy.
There are fantastic performances by everyone in the main cast including John C. Reilly who was at that point in his career still searching for where he belonged. He is actually a pretty fantastic serious actor and I don't believe I have ever seen him in this sort of role. Because of his work with primarily Will Ferrell, I can't really take him seriously as an actor despite the fact that this was many years before those two knew one another and it was years before I think almost anyone even knew who Will even was.
![image.png](https://images.hive.blog/768x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTm2HnDqLDgcToXVfbC8h8R71Q3agdctW5uPouf8tUYg3/image.png)
src
This is a very important story and it is a true story to boot and normally, that sort of thing would really appeal to me. This movie DID in fact appeal to me but there was a couple of problems in the execution that kind of made it, how do I say this, "less than perfect." I am nitpicking here but I also say this as someone that really appreciates Michael J. Fox. He simply isn't believable as a soldier. For one thing he is too small, not that soldiers can't be small or anything but it doesn't exactly suit him. Also, as a babyface of an actor, him acting tough towards anyone seems out of place and I just kept expecting Dr. Emmett Brown to turn up and get him out of there at any time.
![image.png](https://images.hive.blog/768x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmWSmPVsgbtkCHYS4Vz6SSh4azdo4FcyLWBCyfQjmXEgdu/image.png)
src
While not exactly on a Tom Cruise level or anything, they do use some camera tricks such as positioning of actors to conceal how short Fox actually is. Standing directly next to John C. Reilly in the first picture, you get an idea about how small Fox actually is.
The crisis of conscious and the levels of authority in the military are on full display in this film and I think that it is important for people to see this film because of that. Those of us that have never served in the military have an enlightened idea about what it is actually like to be in a war situation and how the chain of command is something that absolutely must be respected, even if the person that outranks you is definitely in the wrong.
Another problem I had with this movie was the extremely lackluster special effects that take place with the mortar attacks early on in the film. I understand that it was 1989 but these explosions looked more like fireworks than actual bombs and personally, I would have preferred they just be implied rather than shown in such a cheap manner.
![image.png](https://images.hive.blog/768x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRpLjUgYviuRNBg1urEQXwwkYDKoeQuZLLh8faswUec3V/image.png)
src
one thing that I find intriguing about this film and would like to know more about is that Michael J. Fox is known for being a very kind and wonderful person to work with whereas Sean Penn is known for being an insufferable asshole both on and off the set. Since Fox was the lead actor in this, I wonder if Penn took this as a slight and was extra mean to Fox while filming. There have been a lot of reports that Sean Penn is downright horrible to costars and definitely doesn't like being upstaged, so I would imagine that there were some "incidents" on set while filming.
Sean tries to steal the scene in any scene that he is in and well, that is expected of him. There is no denying his acting caliber and he is part of a very small select group of people that can do almost anything very well. No disrespect meant to Fox, but he is not in this category.
Should I watch it?
I think so, yes, especially if you enjoy war movies. This isn't your typical "go USA!" type of film but rather, it explores a darker side of warfare that probably happens a lot more than is reported. This movie will be very disturbing to a lot of people though so do not watch this with your kids unless you want to have to answer a lot of very difficult questions.
Casualties of War was a box-office failure, losing nearly $10 million before accounting in promotional expenses. I can't say why that is because it was mostly well-received by critics. It may have had something to do with the very disturbing elements that are portrayed in the movie as well as the fact that for a combat movie, there isn't actually much combat taking place.
I enjoyed it, but had my issues with it. Regardless, I think this is a movie worth seeing
![photodune-6774981-recommended-grunge-red-stamp-xs-643x272.jpg](https://images.hive.blog/768x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmboFnkdoQgzhLrz5FaTHfvKeKaRqG3A4FafY4JyeiAgDR/photodune-6774981-recommended-grunge-red-stamp-xs-643x272.jpg)
HBO Max or "Max" has this for free as part of their streaming service. Almost all other major services have it for rent for a small fee
Yea.. I definitely see your point about fox and other actors who fit and are so good in a certain role, that its hard to ever be great in as any other character. but then, I was just re-watching Commando for the upteenth time and although I always think of Arnold as Conan, I really enjoy seeing him in all his movies. Same with so many of those great actors.. :)
Arnold was a unique individual and he was ok in comedies but not true comedies. Things like True Lies and Twins come to mind... there was a comic edge in almost all of what he did but I don't think he would work out at all in a purely comedic role. Michael is good in dramatic roles and I loved his OCD riddled character on SCRUBS, but a member of a group of soldiers in wartime? Sorry, that just doesn't work for him.
true. 😉😆
I enjoyed Fox as well but not in these types of films as you cannot take it seriously. I watched this film when it came out and as war movies go I would grade it a dud. Maybe Fox ruined this, but I think it is worth watching if you haven't see it, but definitely not worth a second watch.
Fox is one of my favorite actors ever but honestly, he doesn't really have a wide range and his small stature is a major reason why this is the case. In the one scene where he attacks his fellow soldiers with a shovel, hell, even that wasn't believable.
This movie is worth a watch as you say, because it is an important side of war that doesn't get talked about as much as it should. I think it would have been a lot better had they put almost anyone else in that spot instead of Fox.
It was sad when he became ill as he was a live wire and a decent actor for certain roles. Definitely no action hero and even why Tom Cruise struggles. Imagine having to stand on boxes to give you more height.
Congratulations @netflixr! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 1750 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Check out our last posts: