RE: Unexpectedly Disappointing || Review Of Foe (2023)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Well written film review, thank you very much.
There is an oversupply of bad films, as always the gems are a rarity, aren't they? Especially when the scriptwriters follow the zeitgeist superficially rather than using it as an opportunity to tell a truly accomplished story.
I would immediately subscribe to the weaknesses you give the film. The fascination with artificial people replacing real people is very old, certainly well over two hundred years, I suppose. The classic film on this subject is probably still "Blade Runner".
Incidentally, I don't think much of the apparently fashionable gloominess of films. Depressing final messages are of course allowed (and there are plenty of good films with a non-happy ending). But what the abundance of new films seems to be saying to me is: "Guys, there's no point. The world is bad, just give up."
On the other hand, as much as the image of the superhero has been and is exaggerated, I think the image of the depressed future man is just as exaggerated. But if the stylistic device of exaggeration is well realised, there's never anything to be said against it. If you want to write good scripts, I think you need a lot of life experience. Bad film scripts seem to represent little of it.
I couldn't agree more about the abundance of bad films recently. There's been a significant shift in the way movies were made in the past compared to the present time. But how can we find the true gems without seeing them all? Hehe. I wish scriptwriters and filmmakers would delve into more profound storytelling like most old movies. I know a cinephile who prefers to see old movies of say 60s and 70s rather than the recent releases.
I thought I was alone in this! 😄 I'm getting tired of the sad or unrealistic endings. Thanks so much for reading my review and your thoughtful response. I know you have a keen eye for storytelling and it's nuances, so maybe you'd like to check out our ongoing contest. 😊 !PIZZA
... Watching trailers? ... LoL - but you are right, it is not easy to find the gems without watching the non-gems. I noticed that I don't need to watch a whole movie in order to find out if it's a good script and character build up. Mostly, ten or fifteen minutes are enough to find out.
The high amount of bad movies are elsewhere called "Storytelling entropy".
You can sense whether a message is only being delivered because you want to deliver one at all or whether it is one that is convincing.
Entropy is evident in the fact that big budgets try to mix everything with everything that has ever been successful. They mix genres and former high performer flicks together, the heroes look like heroes and speak like heroes, but have no recognisable path of suffering behind them and are "just like that", without any recognisable reason. They have no mentors and no arduous journeys, no narrated failures, so they seem hollow and insubstantial. Even the sufferers suffer for little recognisable reason, it is as if the suffering itself is "just there".
Entropy, if I have understood it correctly, means that clearly distinguishable elements become so intermingled that at some point it becomes impossible to distinguish between them. Like dark blue ink colour, which, if you pour it into a glass of water, can be clearly recognised by streaks. But if it has been mixed with the water long enough, everything turns light blue.
For a good story though, the viewer needs to identify and distinguish the characters and their unique path in life.
😄 not at all. I love movies and there are still many people who love them, too. The younger generation though seems not very interested in movies. They watch "clips" or play games. ... I am still not certain about the meme-thing. Can one understand a meme without understanding a plot?
Thank you for the compliment. In the moment I am not so much into storytelling myself. It probably will come back, though. Have fun in the contest!