Film Review: The Adventures of Pluto Nash (2002)
When a film becomes obscure despite a hefty budget and a superstar on its poster, this usually happens for a good reason. This state of affairs, while acceptable for those involved, can serve as a cautionary tale. A prime example of such a cinematic misstep is found in The Adventures of Pluto Nash, a science fiction comedy that stands out as one of the most notorious flops of 21st Century Hollywood.
The plot takes place on the colonised Moon in the year 2087, where Pluto Nash, portrayed by Eddie Murphy, navigates a world of crime and intrigue. When mysterious mobster threatens his nightclub, Pluto finds himself entangled in a web of conspiracy alongside his android assistant Bruno (played by Randy Quaid) and the resourceful Dina (played by Rosario Dawson).
The journey of The Adventures of Pluto Nash was far from smooth, with a protracted and troubled production history dating back to 1983. Originally envisioned for Harrison Ford, the project eventually landed in the hands of Castle Rock Productions in the 1990s, with Eddie Murphy, popular comedian whose career has rebounded after series of failures, stepping into the lead role. Director Ron Underwood, known for his work in light comedies, seemed a fitting choice for a film that aimed to blend humour with futuristic setting. Despite its promising origins, The Adventures of Pluto Nash spiralled into a financial disaster. With a budget of $100 million, the film grossed a mere $7 million during its initial run, cementing its status as a colossal box office failure. Reviews echoed the film's shortcomings, with its bad reputation persisting to this day.
The film's exotic lunar setting, brought to life through unconvincing CGI, fails to elevate its lacklustre generic plot. While it attempts to infuse humour through references to cloning and androids, The Adventures of Pluto Nash falls short of delivering engaging science fiction or inspired comedy. The writing, in particular, is criticized for its abysmal quality, with jokes that miss the mark or become tiresomely repetitive, notably exemplified by the grating portrayal of the robot character played by Randy Quaid. Amidst the film's shortcomings, a brief shining moment emerges in the form of John Cleese's appearance as a robot taxi. However, this bright spot is fleeting and insufficient to salvage the overall viewing experience. Test screenings in early 2001 revealed the film's inherent flaws, prompting extensive reshoots that only served to compound the embarrassment surrounding this cinematic fiasco.
RATING: 2/10 (-)
Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com
Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/
InLeo blog https://inleo.io/@drax.leo
Hiveonboard: https://hiveonboard.com?ref=drax
Rising Star game: https://www.risingstargame.com?referrer=drax
1Inch: https://1inch.exchange/#/r/0x83823d8CCB74F828148258BB4457642124b1328e
BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG
ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7
BCH donations: qpvxw0jax79lhmvlgcldkzpqanf03r9cjv8y6gtmk9
Posted Using InLeo Alpha